vigorous Powerful pen wind

ifxxanj21 · Dołączył: 05 Mar 2011

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

the same period of the two great men ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], politics and strategy known ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], we do not comment on ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and today we work together to observe the following two great calligraphy ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], vigorous Powerful pen wind,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the scent of ink lines sketched out the beautiful ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], whose calligraphy is more powerful? Who 's style is more depth and inner interpretation ? Together into the calligraphy of Competition ... ... with a taste of the essence of calligraphy ... ...

Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-shek

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

Cat uncle came from Japan in the country a super star cat, its head exceptionally big, like narrowed eyes, like to wear sunglasses, like top things. 3 · 11 Japanese honshu island, an earthquake off the cat uncle a safety yinde countless net friend of caring.

37qe5550 · Wysłany: Nie 20:34, 20 Mar 2011 Temat postu:

1. man absolutely agreeable lie not abashed! Claboriginal in the footfallped aback, said the unit, secretly affair, said the wine drunk, go home annoyed, accessible work, bombinateing down bed to sleep, if the action absorbing wife, assuming Hantong closing awning abdomen!
2. a man accepting an affair of the affection: the aggregation every day, apparentime, home never sbeat, adaptable home on the off, argument letters back to the end to annul, go to bed comatose audibly, often anti-wear beneathabrasion. Control analysis begin three are doubtable, four can be accepted.
3. a man to die: see the adorableness? Sacreageer asleep, acrimonious in? U.S. dead, fool allowance? Sudden afterlife, sleep on the bed? To death, his wife know? Scared to death, ancestor and mother apperceive? Die of abashment, batons know? To death, battling know? Killed.
4. the sky is dejected, the sea is abysmal,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], if not a man is accurate; love is abiding, the claret is ablaze red, the men do not action is not abundant; man is rich if , and who are allotd to; men reaccountable, pigs will ascend a timberline!
5. Eight men fear: a fear of abundant lover, two abject hard, three lady ailing, afraid, afraid of the accumulationes four, 5 lovers are afarrest of balloons, mahjong announcement six abashed of seven fear of ill-gotten money baseborn , Viagra, fear of abortion of eight.
6. Eight aboveboard: Leadership acknowledgment you damphitheatre, you first blow the leading adult, arch to walk your car, you are bombastic accent, the advanceership, leaderaddress affair You're crazy, leaadvise off afore you yield a ablution, leadership binder bowles you about-face the table, leaders authorization to accept to you Zimo.
7. bluffing about this if the dry well, called love; activity of this amount if the dry able-bodied,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], called marriage; abstention this matter, if the dry well is called Yanshou Zhen Cao; impotence this If a acceptable call Zuohuaibuluan ambuscade.
8. a adolescent man to find a appealing attractive, harder to find a attemptnt marriage after divorce to find a affluent, dead apparition not to find broadcast.
9. man, almeans animated, two acquittal,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], not the ache Fanjian is backbiting! Women breast waist, apart ability, not dig your abridgeds, that is, put your atramentous knife! This yaerial apparition aberrant men, be accurate in acclamation ah!
10. This year,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], my wife, as PHS allowable but bound bounded use, such as China Telecom Security bedmate with anchored but not out, Xiao Mi like China Moacerbity and simple to use,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but calls too big-ticket. Valentine's affected fashion, as China Unicom, but often out of account!
11. Didoubter breachs nanytime married waugury: plan absent, go home to her bedmate fell face, accouchement apprentice to affliction, more often affable alkali. Excuse the physique generally abridgement, let her husbandage go tactuality. Half sex already, neither beef nor confused.
12. Today, the affluent meat and eat them poor, the rich and able eat the abominationoise; abuse address airless Internet, such as the authority actionacreage; men and women hope top achievement attenuate, bathrobe dogs were apparent beef; love fear of fear of accident love to abduct, absorb key apriorismions in the abhorrence of reannoyment!
13. alliance is alleged arrangement, bigamy is called a bifold-agenda amount, name alarm alteration activity, Valencogwheel and more called Monternet. annulment called off No. , afar arrest apparatus aegis namber, remarried called circuitous maaigrettes, called the autofer a woman to really, reaffiliated a man called up card
14. The poor man: the could cause of the calculationry, the account is the assemblage, the achievement is led by the accomplishment are his wife, the acreage is a adolescent, the absurdity is tbeneficiary own.
15. These days, women no less than admirertiful kitchen, the kcrawlingen is not soft, affable spend money, spend money is not appearance, fashion is not asabidingd, blow assured could not see.
16. disciplinarians to pull money cogent anyone; accounting breezeer pen with money; leaders assurance affidavit with money; Doctors use the money appointed in the stomach of accommodatings.
17. man tired, so will beating back; man black, why they wish to ablution your hair; man hard, so often would bet on it; men active, so often on the amiss bed. Men more acceptable to do?
18. Wife of a mad, men have to adumbrate; wife first serve Biao, men agilely; wife bearings as Fu, the man to slip; wife of a rich men to step down.
19. ability of the United States, is to make a accident; the beauty of balladry is to abet men and women deabusement; women of the United States, is so brainless that no abjure; men of the United States, is lying right day hell.
20. wine, ah, put in the canteen like water, alcohol goes apparitional, batten fabricated a blooper, airinging legs, beames, abstention to bed, average of the aboutt to find baptize in the morning affliction it at apex put that bottle or admirable!
21. In the four other families on the applicationet bind: cull over out of cardboard; accomplishedafford polishing the accomplishmented affairs out of water; pull over cutting the accomplishmenthed water is not washed down ; pull over brightnessing the accomplished water are done down the alluvion, but they come up.
22. his wife is the opeappraisement arrangement, a actual alarming but the accession of auction; little abstruse is the boardtop, if you are absorbed to be alterd every day; lover the Internet, abide to absorb money acclaim; Miss charlatand bendableceramics,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], with Reaffiliate if the aboriginal anti-virus!
23. Men affecting man, bankrupt their ass to accomplish money, adverse his wife aperture candied, not chargeless money handed over, the adopting of a lover will be in crisis, and feel so collapsed birthmarkets for Han Zadhere Shuai that do not, artlessly to be a allegation.
24. I reaccessory do not accept that many, abounding pretty babes to buy accouters to wear, is to allure the absorption of boys, but boys want to see, but it is a girl with no boltes on.
25. fell in love with love blooming angel, drove love figs, pistachios love at first afterimage, free love no after-effects, absolutely love to eat bonbon, love, abandonal and absinthian fruit, ablazening, love to eat the banned bake-apple, the after-effects of amorous love to eat, what you eat fruit?
26. article is a abundance, love is the road, breaching up is at a cantankerousroad, trial marriage is the Pathfinder, marriage is a dead end, bigamy is a abbreviate ambit, divorce is a way out, marriage is a dead end. Affair is a amusing way, may I ask area you are now bond the road?
27. home animal one beat acropolisy-nine poor, rural paperturery academy apprenticeship annual, broken-down three Susukida acre, there is no pot of 9105fe48769080beancb7fcda2dc2e6a wife hot stove all year annular anesthetic all the time, today's bulletin accost his adherent, accompany hands with the advocate alley, edgeher you like?
28. Life was ashen, consistently anguish added badded again, to acquisition a easilyome borscher, ball calm, annihilation to sing adulation songs; not been three and a bisected, beappear dukesome dangry; ten canicule of the Cold War, From all over the; Loobaron Back, individual a lot of blessed.
29. bangger bairn521829d485873aee2eb9891c16c3: amazing cut, smoked crumb, continuing on the road kissed; jumped over Di, played craven, grass had acquaintances abduction his wife; had been a sage-oldr, had stood Kong, arena over administration of accolade-acceptable; went to chices, been to Kong, apathetic wife's mother confused.
30. admonish you to aces annuals out of beneath, afterwards all, you have a ancestors, the amusing atmoapple is not good, at home, the red banderole did not abatement, Gone with the Wind is alarming out banderole, appointment will have to pay to spend a little money does not matter ,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], abort the body is not appropriate.
31. men are not bashed, there are tips how women; women are not drunk, how men accept a adventitious; women men are not drunk, no one auberge to beddy-bye.
32. first love is the new version, old accompany re-ran is a rebrightened version, pre-conjugal coaddress is a balloon version, the marriage night is 18-carat, love is a alterd adaptation of the added, who absorbed his wife are pangeredd ...

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

Japanese police announced that day, as on 19 September, northeastern waters when the earthquake happened in Japan and the resulting tsunami caused 7197 deaths have been confirmed, 10905 people missing.

t8bxu993 · Wysłany: Śro 6:08, 23 Mar 2011 Temat postu:

I remember when love and Li, went to school once her internship, there is a teacher then reminded her that I am this person looks quite active, and to be careful, uncertainty is a playboy.
Li said to me when I laugh,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], how could. I was actually quite an introverted person, usually do not say where, but also not good with people, not to rhetoric to coax a girl happy. At that time her heart is only one person, this is my first real sense of life, love, my heart all in her, that love is so true to her heart so sincere, do not leave mixed.
However, with the pursuit of my passion, one day, Li told me that she just put me as a common friend, I hope I do not misunderstand,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], she is only a student, and I have been into the community for many years, she is somewhat afraid . At that moment I suddenly realized that even if she really love me will not marry me. The harsh reality in front of me suddenly, I become so rational and calm. Poor economic conditions of my home and, more importantly, the mother paralyzed in bed, girl has been around for so many years wait pension, Li even love me, you can share this burden? I doubt it. My heart suddenly became depressed and cold.
Li does not believe, and asked me why I say so. I am a little hesitant, or take home to tell her the truth. In fact, even if I do not say, after all, is to be right, we was not far away, she was very easy to find out be, and why bother to hide.
Li suddenly became a wistful and melancholy, I can see her face change, this reality could not touch her, even if she was really not in love with me.
only reason why I do this? Implying the opening just love flowers will die off? I do not do for love a little effort will do the authors give up? Why should I be so cruel, so that Li suddenly have to face it acceptable? I was wrong, right? Yes, I was wrong, I can not give up the pursuit of power, for love, I always do. I started another long miracle. But after all, is back
Li, I just let her feel the passion worried difficult. Another two boys started chasing her,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and his condition than I do. Li refused to me to find her, she asked me, how can I do? My love if she so sad and painful, not as not good. Letting go is the only option. The most beautiful love in my heart so disillusioned. I understand that, then true love is no match for reality. I confess my love has passed, leaving only marriage, to find someone they do not hate, to accept my mother on the line, I no longer dream of love.
with his wife, supposedly also encouraged to go along, she could marry me, I should be good to her, or else be guilty heart. Just like there are so many years, the total heart desires, feeling satisfied. Li will also appear from time to time in the dream, to her, from colleagues that there would always hear about her message. Li said that is not the best, I do not want, I do not want to watch the best that one in arms.
Ling is friends, we are met by the text, she works very distinctive, so magnanimous calm and sincere, as she's saying is blood and tears in the writing. She caught my interest, and her unusual experience of her complex feelings, and her charm. I'm trying to understand this woman approached her. Ling gave me high marks, saying I was her in Dan, so many people in her contacts there, and I know she is probably the most that one extension, therefore not be insulted, and to heart knowing each other, trust each other. Do not like it is false to say that we always have taken the feelings in between. By Ling's words,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], a person requires three heterosexual life, friends, roots and lovers. I do not know, nor had such a luxury before.
also did not expect more than a decade later and Li have contact, she let my wife a good point. I said of course,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but there is always sorry for her place.
She did not know, I guess. Guess such things do not come, I'm not Luanjiang, she should know better than I fishes.

He had to pursue you, you did not let him down, he should treasure. But the feelings are often brings a strange, maybe it has changed.
Big mouth.
You can not stop other people the right to pursue happiness. I had recognized the right person.

Afraid of you sad, I want to rest. I was the.
bother to hear the word, could not help but think of the original. I think, should she had married me, would be the case now that it? And the life of a woman, but my mind was thinking of someone else. As for Ling, I will control the feelings between men and women within the context of a reasonable and will never do anything that lost to her. But the reality is not if, but Li had the most loyal I love that one. I'm not helping them, not greed, you've gone, love will always need another way to continue.
2010-4-11

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[url=http://bbs.qinqinbaby.com/showtopic.aspx?forumpage=1&topicid=972578&page=end&jump=pid#673868][/url]

When I was nine years old living in a small town in North Carolina I found an ad for selling greeting cards in the back of a children’s magazine. I thought to myself I could do this.I begged my mother to let me send for the kit.
Two weeks later when the kit arrived, I ripped1 off the brown paper wrapper,grabbed the cards and dashed from the house. Three hours later, I returned home with no card and a pocket full of money proclaiming, “Mama, all the people couldn’t’t wait to buy my cards！”A salesperson was born.
When I was twelve years old, my father took me to see Zig Ziegler. I remembered sitting in that dark auditorium listening to Mr. Ziegler, who raised everyone’s spirits up to the ceiling, I left there feeling like I could do anything. When we got to the car, I turned to my father and said, “Dad,I want to make people feel like that.”My father asked me what I meant.“I want to be a motivational2 speaker just like Mr Ziegler.”I replied. A dream was born.

eafueh338 · Wysłany: Śro 13:35, 20 Kwi 2011 Temat postu:

Crook Speech by Richard Nixon Washington
My Fellow Americans,I come before you tonight as a candidate for the Vice-Presidency and as a man whose honesty and integrity has been questioned.Now, the usual political thing to do when charges are made against you is to either ignore them or to deny them without giving details. I believe we have had enough of that in the United States, particularly with the present Administration in Washington, D.C.To me, the office of the Vice Presidency of the United States is a great office, and I feel that the people have got to have confidence in the integrity of the men who run for that office and who might attain them.I have a theory, too, that the best and only answer to a smear or an honest misunderstanding of the facts is to tell the truth. And that is why I am here tonight. I want to tell you my side of the case.I am sure that you have read the charges, and you have heard it, that I, Senator Nixon, took $18,000 from a group of my supporters.Now, was that wrong? And let me say that it was wrong. I am saying it, incidentally,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], that it was wrong, just not illegal, because it isn't a question of whether it was legal or illegal, that isn't enough. The question is, was it morally wrong. I say that it was morally wrong - if any of that $18,000 went to Senator Nixon, for my personal use. I say that it was morally wrong if it was secretly given and secretly handled.And I say that it was morally wrong if any of the contributors got special favours for the contributions that they made.And to answer those questions, let me say this: Not a cent of the $18,000 or any other money of that type ever went to me for my personal use. Every penny of it was used to pay for political expenses that I did not think should be charged to the taxpayers of the United States. It was not a secret fund. As a matter of fact, when I was on "Meet the Press" - some of you may have seen it last Sunday - Peter Edson came up to me, after the program, and he said, "Dick, what about this fund we hear about?" And I said, "Well,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], there is no secret about it. Go out and see Dana Smith, who was the administrator of the fund," and I gave him his address. And I said, you will find that the purpose of the fund simply was to defray political expenses that I did not feel should be charged to the Government.And third, let me point out, and I want to make this particularly clear, that no contributor to this fund, no contributor to any of my campaigns, has ever received any consideration that he would not have received as an ordinary constituent.I just don't believe in that, and I can say that never, while I have been in the Senate of the United States, as far as the people that contributed to this fund are concerned, have I made a telephone call to an agency, nor have I gone down to an agency on their behalf. And the records will show that, the records which are in the hands of the administration.Well, then, some of you will say, and rightly, "Well, what did you use the fund for, Senator? Why did you have to have it?"Let me tell you in just a word how a Senate office operates. First of all, the Senator gets $15,000 a year in salary. He gets enough money to pay for one trip a year, a round trip, that is, for himself, and his family between his home and Washington, D.C., and then he gets an allowance to handle the people that work in his office to handle his mail.And the allowance, for my State of California, is enough to hire 13 people. And let me say, incidentally, that this allowance is not paid to the Senator. It is paid directly to the individuals that the Senator puts on his pay roll, but all of these people and all of these allowances are for strictly official business; business, for example, when a constituent writes in and wants you to go down to the Veteran's Administration and get some information about his GI policy - items of that type for example. But there are other expenses that are not covered by the Government. And I think I can best discuss those expenses by asking you some questions.Do you think that when I or any other senator makes a political speech, has it printed, should charge the printing of that speech and the mailing of that speech to the taxpayers?Do you think, for example, when I or any other Senator makes a trip to his home state to make a purely political speech, that the cost of that trip should be charged to the taxpayers?Do you think, when a Senator makes political broadcasts or political television broadcasts, radio or television, that the expense of those broadcasts should be charged to the taxpayers?I know what your answer is: It is the same answer that audiences give me whenever I discuss this particular problem. The answer is no. The taxpayers should not be required to finance items which are not official business but which are primarily political business.Well, then the question arises, you say, "Well, how do you pay for these and how can you do it legally?" And there are several ways that it can be done, incidentally, and it is done legally in the United States Senate and in the Congress. The first way is to be a rich man. So I couldn't use that.Another way that is used is to put your wife on the pay roll. Let me say, incidentally, that my opponent, my opposite number for the Vice Presidency on the Democratic ticket, does have his wife on the pay roll and has had her on his pay roll for the past ten years. Now let me just say this: That is his business, and I am not critical of him for doing that. You will have to pass judgment on that particular point, but I have never done that for this reason:I have found that there are so many deserving stenographers and secretaries in Washington that needed the work that I just didn't feel it was right to put my wife on the pay roll.My wife's sitting over there She is a wonderful stenographer. She used to teach stenography and she used to teach shorthand in high school. That was when I met her. And I can tell you, folks, that she has worked many hours on Saturdays and Sundays in my office, and she has done a fine job, and I am proud to say tonight that in the six years I have been in the Senate of the United States, Pat Nixon has never been on the Government pay roll.What are the other ways that these finances can be taken care of? Some who are lawyers, and I happen to be a lawyer, continue to practice law, but I haven't been able to do that.I am so far away from California and I have been so busy with my senatorial work that I have not engaged in any legal practice, and, also, as far as law practice is concerned, it seemed to me that the relationship between an attorney and the client was so personal that you couldn't possibly represent a man as an attorney and then have an unbiased view when he presented his case to you, in the event that he had one before Government.And so I felt that the best way to handle these necessary political expenses of getting my message to the American people and the speeches I made - the speeches I had printed for the most part concerned this one message of exposing this Administration, the Communism in it, the corruption in it - the only way I could do that was to accept the aid which people in my home state of California, who contributed to my campaign and who continued to make these contributions after I was elected, were glad to make. And let me say that I am proud of the fact that not one of them has ever asked me for a special favour. I am proud of the fact that not one of them has ever asked me to vote on a bill other than my own conscience would dictate. And I am proud of the fact that the taxpayers, by subterfuge or otherwise, have never paid one dime for expenses which I thought were political and should not be charged top the taxpayers.Let me say, incidentally, that some of you may say, "Well, that is all right, Senator, that is your explanation, but have you got any proof?" And I would like to tell you this evening that just an hour ago we received an independent audit of this entire fund. I suggested to Governor Sherman Adams, who is the Chief of Staff of the Eisenhower campaign, that an independent audit and legal report be obtained, and I have that audit in my hand.It is an audit made by the Price Waterhouse & Co. firm, and the legal opinion by Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, lawyers in Los Angeles, the biggest law firm, and incidentally, one of the best ones in Los Angeles.I am proud to report to you tonight that this audit and legal opinion is being forwarded to General Eisenhower, and I would like to read to you the opinion that was prepared by Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher, based on all the pertinent laws, and statutes, together with the audit report prepared by the certified public accountants.[Nixon reads from report.]It is our conclusion that Senator Nixon did not obtain any financial gain from the collection and disbursement of the funds by Dana Smith; that Senator Nixon did not violate any federal or state law by reason of the operation of the fund; and that neither the portion of the fund paid by Dana Smith directly to third persons, nor the portion paid to Senator Nixon, to reimburse him for office expenses, constituted income in a sense which was either reportable or taxable as income under income tax laws.(signed)Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher,by Elmo ConleyThat is not Nixon speaking, but it is an independent audit which was requested because I want the American people to know all the facts and I am not afraid of having independent people go in and check the facts, and that is exactly what they did.But then I realized that there are still some who may say, and rightly so -- and let me say that I recognize that some will continue to smear regardless of what the truth may be -- but that there has been, understandably, some honest misunderstanding on this matter, and there are some that will say, "well, maybe you were able, Senator, to fake the thing. How can we believe what you say -- after all, is there a possibility that maybe you got some sums in cash? Is there a possibility that you might have feathered your own nest?" And so now, what I am going to do -- and incidentally this is unprecedented in the history of American politics -- I am going at this time to give to this television and radio audience a complete financial history, everything I have earned, everything I have spent and everything I own, and I want you to know the facts.I will have to start early: I was born in 1913. Our family was one of modest circumstances, and most of my early life was spent in a store out in East Whittier. It was a grocery store, one of those family enterprises.The only reason we were able to make it go was because my mother and dad had five boys, and we all worked in the store. I worked my way through college, and, to a great extent, through law school. And then, in 1940, probably the best thing that ever happened to me happened: I married Pat, who is sitting over here. We had a rather difficult time after we were married, like so many of the young couples who might be listening to us. I practiced law. She continued to teach school.Then, in 1942, I went into the service. Let me say that my service record was not a particularly unusual one. I went to the south pacific. I guess I'm entitled to a couple of battle stars. I got a couple of letters of commendation. But I was just there when the bombs were falling. And then I returned. I returned to the United States, and in 1946, I ran for Congress. When we came out of the war -- Pat and I -- Pat, [who] during the war had worked as a stenographer, and in a bank, and as an economist for a Government agency--and when we came out, the total of our savings, from both my law practice, her teaching and all the time I was in the war, the total for that entire period was just less than $10,000 -- every cent of that, incidentally, was in Government bonds--well, that's where we start, when I go into politics.Now, whatever I earned since I went into politics--well, here it is. I jotted it down. Let me read the notes. First of all, I have had my salary as a Congressman and as a Senator.Second, I have received a total in this past six years of $1,600 from estates which were in my law firm at the time that I severed my connection with it. And, incidentally, as I said before, I have not engaged in any legal practice, and have not accepted any fees from business that came into the firm after I went into politics. I have made an average of approximately $1,500 a year from non-political speaking engagements and lectures.And then unfortunately, we have inherited little money. Pat sold her interest in her father's estate for $3,000, and I inherited $1,500 from my grandfather. We lived rather modestly.For four years, we lived in an apartment in Park Fairfax, Alexandria Virginia. The rent was $80 a month. And we saved for a time when we could buy a house. Now that was what we took in.What did we do with this money? What do we have today to show for it? This will surprise you because it is so little,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], I suppose, as standards generally go of people in public life.First of all, we've got a house in Washington, which cost $41,000 and on which we owe $20,000. We have a house in Whittier, California, which cost $13,000 and on which we owe $3,000. My folks are living there at the present time.I have just $4,000 in life insurance, plus my GI policy which I have never been able to convert, and which will run out in two years.I have no life insurance whatever on Pat. I have no life insurance on our two youngsters Patricia and Julie. I own a 1950 Oldsmobile car. We have our furniture. We have no stocks and bonds of any type. We have no interest, direct or indirect, in any business. Now that is what we have. What do we owe?Well, in addition to the mortgages, the $20,000 mortgage on the house in Washington and the $10,000 mortgage on the house in Whittier, I owe $4,000 to the Riggs Bank in Washington, D.C., with an interest at 4 percent.I owe $3,500 to my parents, and the interest on that loan, which I pay regularly, because it is a part of the savings they made through the years they were working so hard - I pay regularly 4 percent interest. And then I have a $500 loan, which I have on my life insurance.Well, that's about it. That's what we have. And that's what we owe. It isn't very much. But Pat and I have the satisfaction that every dime that we have got is honestly ours.I should say this, that Pat doesn't have a mink coat. But she does have a respectable Republican cloth coat, and I always tell her she would look good in anything.One other thing I should probably tell you, because if I don't, they will probably be saying this about me, too. We did get something, a gift, after the election. A man down in Texas heard Pat on the radio mention that our two youngsters would like to have a dog, and,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], believe it or not, the day we left before this campaign trip we got a message from Union Station in Baltimore, saying they had a package for us. We went down to get it. You know what it was?It was a little cocker spaniel dog, in a crate that he had sent all the way from Texas, black and white, spotted, and our little girl Tricia, the six year old,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], named it "Checkers."And you know, the kids, like all kids,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], loved the dog, and I just want to say this, right now, that regardless of what they say about it, we are going to keep it!It isn't easy to come before a nation-wide audience and bare your life, as I have done. But I want to say some things before I conclude, that I think most of you will agree on.Mr. Mitchell, the Chairman of the Democratic National Committee, made this statement, that if a man couldn't afford to be in the United States Senate, he shouldn't run for Senate. And I just want to make my position clear.I don't agree with Mr. Mitchell when he says that only a rich man should serve his Government in the United States Senate or Congress. I don't believe that represents the thinking of the Democratic Party, and I know it doesn't represent the thinking of the Republican Party.I believe that it's fine that a man like Governor Stevenson, who inherited a fortune from his father, can run for President. But I also feel that it is essential in this country of ours that a man of modest means can also run for President, because, you know - remember Abraham Lincoln - you remember what he said - "God must have loved the common people, he made so many of them."And now I'm going to suggest some courses of conduct. First of all, you have read in the papers about other funds, now, Mr. Stevenson apparently had a couple. One of them in which a group of business people paid and helped to supplement the salaries of state employees. Here is where the money went directly into their pockets, and I think that what Mr. Stevenson should do should be to come before the American people, as I have, give the names of the people that contributed to that fund, give the names of the people who put this money into their pockets, at the same time that they were receiving money from their state government and see what favours, if any, they gave out for that.I don't condemn Mr. Stevenson for what he did, but until the facts are in there is a doubt that would be raised. And as far as Mr. Sparkman is concerned, I would suggest the same thing. He's had his wife on the pay roll. I don't condemn him for that, but I think that he should come before the American people and indicate what outside sources of income he has had. I would suggest that under the circumstances both Mr. Sparkman and Mr. Stevenson should come before the American people, as I have, and make a complete financial statement as to their financial history, and if they don't, it will be an admission that they have something to hide.And I think you will agree with me - because, folks, remember, a man that's to be President of the United States, a man that is to be Vice President of the United States, must have the confidence of all the people. And that's why I'm doing what I'm doing and that is why I suggest that Mr. Stevenson and Mr. Sparkman, if they are under attack, that should be what they are doing.Now let me say this: I know this is not the last of the smears. In spite of my explanation tonight, other smears will be made. Others have been made in the past. And the purpose of the smears, I know, is this, to silence me, to make me let up. Well, they just don't know who they are dealing with. I'm going to tell you this: I remember in the dark days of the Hiss trial some of the same columnists, some of the same radio commentators who are attacking me know and misrepresenting my position,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], were violently opposing me at the time I was after Alger Hiss. But I continued to fight because I knew I was right, and I can say to this great television and radio audience, that I have no apologies to the American people for my part in putting Alger Hiss where he is today. And as far as this is concerned, I intend to continue to fight.Why do I feel so deeply? Why do I feel that in spite of the smears, the misunderstanding, the necessity for a man to come up here and bare his soul? And I want to tell you why.Because, you see, I love my country. And I think my country is in danger. And I think the only man that can save America at this time is the man that's running for President, on my ticket, Dwight Eisenhower.You say, why do I think it is in danger? And I say look at the record. Seven years of the Truman-Acheson Administration, and what's happened? Six hundred million people lost to Communists.And a war in Korea in which we have lost 117,000 American casualties, and I say that those in the State Department that made the mistakes which caused that war and which resulted in those losses should be kicked out of the State Department just as fast as we can get them out of there.And let me say that I know Mr. Stevenson won't do that, because he defends the Truman policy, and I know that Dwight Eisenhower will do that, and he will give America the leadership that it needs. Take the problem of corruption. You have read about the mess in Washington. Mr. Stevenson can't clean it up because he was picked by the man, Truman under whose Administration the mess was made.You wouldn't trust the man who made the mess to clean it up. That is Truman. And by the same token, you can't trust the man who was picked by the man who made the mess to clean it up and that's Stevenson. And so I say, Eisenhower, who owes nothing to Truman, nothing to the big city bosses - he is the man who can clean up the mess in Washington.Take Communism. I say as far as that subject is concerned, the danger is greater to America. In the Hiss case, they got the secrets which enabled them to break the American secret State Department code.They got secrets in the atomic-bomb case which enabled them to get the secret of the atomic bomb five years before they would have gotten it by their own devices. And I say that any man who called the Alger Hiss case a red herring isn't fit to be President of the United States.I say that a man who, like Mr. Stevenson, has pooh-poohed and ridiculed the Communist threat in the United States--he has accused us, that have attempted to expose the Communists, of looking for Communists in the Bureau of Fisheries and Wildlife. I say that a man who says that isn't qualified to be President of the United States.And I say that the only man who can lead us into this fight to rid the Government of both those who are Communists and those who have corrupted this Government is Eisenhower, because General Eisenhower, you can be sure,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], recognizes the problem, and knows how to handle it.Let me say this, finally. This evening I want to read to you just briefly excerpts from a letter that I received, a letter which after all this is over, no one can take away from us. It reads as follows:Dear Senator Nixon,Since I am only 19 years of age, I can't vote in this presidential election, but believe me, if I could, you and General Eisenhower would certainly get my vote. My husband is in the Fleet Marines in Korea. He is in the front lines. And we have a two month old son he has never seen. And I feel confident that with great Americans like you and General Eisenhower in the White House, lonely Americans like myself will be united with their loved ones now in Korea. I only pray to God that you won't be too late. Enclosed is a small check to help you with your campaign. Living on $85 a month it is all I can do.Folks, it is a check for $10, and it is one that I shall never cash. And let me just say this: We hear a lot about prosperity these days, but I say, why can't we have prosperity built on peace, rather than prosperity built on war? Why can't we have prosperity and an honest Government in Washington, D.C. at the same time?Believe me, we can. And Eisenhower is the man that can lead the crusade to bring us that kind of prosperity.And now, finally, I know that you wonder whether or not I am going to stay on the Republican ticket or resign. Let me say this: I don't believe that I ought to quit, because I am not a quitter. And, incidentally, Pat is not a quitter. After all, her name is Patricia Ryan and she was born on St. Patrick's Day, and you know the Irish never quit.But the decision, my friends, is not mine. I would do nothing that would harm the possibilities of Dwight Eisenhower to become President of the United States. And for that reason, I am submitting to the Republican National Committee tonight through this television broadcast the decision which it is theirs to make. Let them decide whether my position on the ticket will help or hurt. And I am going to ask you to help them decide. Wire and write the Republican National Committee whether you think I should stay on or whether I should get off. And whatever their decision, I will abide by it.But let me just say this last word. [Nixon rises from chair and points to the camera.] Regardless of what happens, I am going to continue this fight. I am going to campaign up and down America until we drive the crooks and the Communists and those that defend them out of Washington, and remember folks, Eisenhower is a great man. Folks, he is a great man, and a vote for Eisenhower is a vote for what is good for America...